Patient selection
for neurostimulation
Before a patient becomes a candidate for neurostimulation, the patient
should undergo
a thorough evaluation, which should include both physical and psychological
elements.
In addition, all patients should undergo a trial procedure.
Physical evaluation
A comprehensive history and physical examination of the patient should
be completed to ensure that there is an objective basis for the pain.
A complete pain history includes a general medical history with emphasis
on the chronology and symptomatology of the pain. These data should include
information about the onset, quality, intensity, distribution, duration,
course and affective components of the pain, and details about exacerbating
and relieving factors.
The physical examination should also include an
appropriate neurological and musculoskeletal evaluation. The effects of
pain, as well as the causes of pain, should be evaluated and recorded.
In addition, the physician should determine the pain type, pain pattern,
and sources of pain. Determination of such pain characteristics allows
the physician to select the appropriate therapy.
Psychological evaluation
Most physicians agree that before considering neuromodulation, the patient
should be
assessed by a psychiatrist or a psychologist to rule out any psychological
issues that may
affect the therapeutic outcome. This psychological evaluation should take
place in the early
phase of the patient selection process.
A carefully performed psychological evaluation
will have several benefits including, identifying those patients most
likely to benefit from neuromodulation, better preparing the patient and
setting realistic expectations. It can also aid in preventing unsuitable
candidates from
undergoing an invasive and costly procedure and redirecting rejected candidates
to more appropriate treatment programs
Neurostimulation
trial procedure
Conducting a test stimulation before 'permanent implantation' allows patients
and the pain management team to test neurostimulation for both efficacy
and paraesthesia perception,
which sometimes cannot be tolerated despite good pain relief. There is
no consensus on either the technical approach or the length of the SCS
trial. In addition, whether the trial should be carried out in hospitalised
patients or on an outpatient basis is a matter of personal opinion, since
there are no data to support any specific recommendations.
The criteria for a successful trial include
at least a 50% reduction in pain intensity and in those centres able to
measure it, a decrease in analgesic intake and a significant functional
improvement. Patients that show substantial improvements in these parameters
can be considered for a permanent implantation
|